Job hunt in the open

5 first calls out of 317 applications

I am looking for a backend job in Germany and publishing every number as it is. The zeros are real: I have not reached those stages yet.

Role
Senior Backend Engineer · NestJS / Node / TS
Where
Germany (EU Blue Card) · remote · CIS product teams
5Invited to a call2% of applications
1Second interview
0Job offers
212No answer yet

What happened to the applications

The rows follow the hiring stages on one shared scale. A zero here is a real zero, not missing data.

Applied317
Invited to a call5
Second interview1
Final interview0
Job offer0

105 rejections, and that is a minimum: I stopped logging them after 5 June. Another 212 applications have no answer.

Where they went: 48 to a Russian job board, 267 to LinkedIn and European sites, 2 through a personal recommendation.

Not one of those 317 applications led to a recommendation.

Where the applications went out

SourceAppliedFirst calls
hh.ru1553
xing420
ashby320
direct310
Not recorded240
stepstone60
Company boards (Greenhouse)50
getmatch50
hirehi40
lever40
Referral21
Inbound recruiter10
opento_dev10
wantapply10
nodejs_jobs+CryptoBlockchainJobs10
tg10
hcareers10
huntflow10

Too early to read anything into this. A reply takes one to three weeks, so a zero here is a lag, not a verdict. I will switch a source off once it has enough applications behind it and still nothing.

When the applications went out

38 of the 317 applications were out by 5 June. The other 279 have gone out since 1 September.

38 / 317by 5 June
279on 1 September

Between 5 June and 24 August there are no records at all. I kept applying and stopped writing it down.

Day by day

29 logged days. 16 June to 24 September. Requests, replies and messages are all LinkedIn.

I sentmax 159
2
31
159
52
110
2
15 Jun29 Jun13 Jul27 Jul10 Aug24 Aug7 Sep21 Sep
came backmax 19
1
14
19
3
15 Jun29 Jun13 Jul27 Jul10 Aug24 Aug7 Sep21 Sep

One column per week. The two rows have separate scales: I sent far more than came back, so a shared scale would flatten the replies to nothing. A week with no column is a week with nothing logged.

24 Sept

I sent 2 applications. 1 rejection came in.

23 Sept

1 rejection came in.

22 Sept

1 rejection came in.

21 Sept

3 rejections came in.

19 Sept

1 rejection came in.

18 Sept

I sent 2 applications. 3 rejections came in.

17 Sept

I sent 1 application. 6 rejections came in.

16 Sept

I sent 6 applications. 5 rejections came in.

15 Sept

I sent 45 applications. 11 rejections came in.

14 Sept

I sent 56 applications. 12 rejections came in.

13 Sept

I sent 4 applications. 1 rejection came in.

12 Sept

I sent 1 application.

11 Sept

I sent 1 application. 3 rejections came in.

10 Sept

3 rejections came in.

9 Sept

I sent 17 applications. 1 person replied. 7 rejections came in.

8 Sept

I sent 1 message. 3 rejections came in.

7 Sept

I sent 25 applications. 2 people replied. I sent 3 messages. 20 rejections came in.

6 Sept

2 people replied. I sent 8 messages. 1 rejection came in.

5 Sept

I sent 43 applications. I sent 1 message. 1 rejection came in.

4 Sept

I sent 30 applications. 3 rejections came in.

3 Sept

I sent 31 applications. 2 people replied. I sent 2 messages. 2 rejections came in.

2 Sept

I sent 7 applications. 3 people accepted my connection request. 5 people replied. I sent 3 messages. 2 offered to recommend me at their company. 1 rejection came in.

1 Sept

I sent 6 applications and 25 LinkedIn connection requests. 1 person accepted my connection request. 2 people replied. I sent 3 messages. One offered to recommend me at their company.

31 Aug

1 person accepted my connection request.

28 Aug

3 people accepted my connection request.

27 Aug

3 people accepted my connection request.

25 Aug

2 people replied.

24 Aug

I sent 30 LinkedIn connection requests. 3 people accepted my connection request. 3 people replied. I sent 1 message.

16 Jun

1 person replied. I sent 2 messages.

25 conversations in total. In 3 of them the other person offered to recommend me. I never had to ask.

What hiring me actually involves

This is the question that usually surfaces after a first call and quietly ends things. Here it is up front, with the legal references, so nobody has to research it.

Sources: Bundesagentur für Arbeit (ZAV 03/2026) · Make it in Germany / BMWE · § 18g, § 81a AufenthG · § 31a, § 47 AufenthV · checked against primary sources 1 Sept

How these numbers are made